-
-
Writers
-
Categories
-
Recent Comments
- Jesus on Call of Apathy: Violent Young Men and Our Place in War
- Jonscribe on Sea Change: An Apology and Declaration
- shanti diane on Sea Change: An Apology and Declaration
- Edward Pang on I Am Many: Multiple Identities in Persona 3
- John R. Miller on The Doubt of the Benefit: Fake Progress and Lumosity’s “Brain Games”
-
Medium Difficulty Tweets
-
Featured Posts
-
Review: Masters of Doom: How Two Guys Created an Empire and Changed Pop Culture Forever
12 March 2012 -
Octopus Sashimi: Examining the Polemics of Tentacle Bento
1 June 2012 -
Journey and the Myth
12 February 2013 -
Intro to Gender Criticism for Gamers: From Princess Peach, to Claire Redfield, to FemSheps.
24 May 2012 -
Dishonored, Kickstarter, and the Nostalgia Delusion
27 October 2012
-
-
Meta
Tag Archives: Metacritic
Simple Machines: Legend of Grimrock and the Joys of Coherent Design
By Joseph Hilgard “Video games are one of the few remaining artforms where there is an empirical positive correlation between budget and quality.” – The single dumbest thing anybody said to me about video games, ever. Legend of Grimrock is … Continue reading →
Posted in
Criticism
,
Reviews
|
Tagged
Design
,
Dungeon Master
,
Joseph Hilgard
,
King's Quest
,
Legend of Grimrock
,
Ludology
,
Metacritic
,
Might and Magic
,
Portal 2
,
RPGs
,
Spacechem
,
World of Xeen
|
Leave a comment
The Mind’s Eye: In Defence of Subjectivity
I learned the joy of owning a ZX Spectrum this week, but I’ve never played one. I felt the connection between Dear Esther and the end of a relationship I never had. I understood the fear of being an inadequate mother, although I am not a parent. It’s easy to see how a piece entitled “What’s wrong with game reviews?” would provoke games writers, especially those who subscribe to New Games Journalism, but Joseph Hilgard’s essay contradicts what I believe about the value of subjectivity in games writing.
Hilgard and I are both psychologists, and we both focus on video games. My undergraduate dissertation studied non-verbal behaviour differences in violent and non-violent games. Even with a science background, it is a mistake to treat game reviewing as an exact science, something that can be dissected and analysed, assigned scores and scales. There is no ‘Five Factor Model’ of gaming. That approach reminds me of when game review magazines had entire columns dedicated to scores: giving games separate marks for their gameplay and graphic fidelity which didn’t count towards an overall score. Continue reading →
Posted in
Critical Conversation
,
Criticism
|
Tagged
Alan Williamson
,
dan pinchbeck
,
deadly premonition
,
Dear Esther
,
gamefeel
,
hiking tour
,
Joseph Hilgard
,
kieron gillen
,
kyle stegerwald
,
mass effect 3
,
Metacritic
,
metacriticism
,
New Games Journalism
,
non-violent games
,
psychology
,
review scores
,
sega
,
Skyrim
,
subjectivity
,
super metroid
,
tetris
,
violent games
,
zx spectrum
|
5 Comments
What’s Wrong With Game Reviews?
What’s wrong with game reviews? I could complain what a useless measure game scores have become, since the current range of 8-10 scores is too restricted to have any meaning. Imagine how difficult it would be to talk about height if everybody’s height was described as a number between eight and ten. Worse, I find that the most interesting games tend to score in about the 85s, so imagine that sometimes people who were 10 feet tall were actually shorter than people who were eight feet tall. Even if the range of scores were better distributed, though, it still seems like the least interesting titles would still rise to the top. Why is that? Continue reading →
Posted in
Criticism
,
Features
,
Round Table
|
Tagged
badgame
,
Citizen Kane
,
Dragon Age 2
,
Fallout: New Vegas
,
Formalism
,
Games Criticism
,
Grand Theft Auto 4
,
Joseph Hilgard
,
Lana Del Ray
,
Metacritic
,
metacriticism
,
New Games Journalism
,
Orson Welles
,
PC Gamer
,
Rich McCormick
,
Roger Ebert
,
S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Call of Pripyat
|
4 Comments