-
-
Writers
-
Categories
-
Recent Comments
- Julie Sheppard on The Doubt of the Benefit: Fake Progress and Lumosity’s “Brain Games”
- Logan Feeney on How I Helped Destroy Star Wars Galaxies
- taolataohoideolamthe on Call of Apathy: Violent Young Men and Our Place in War
- Christopher Robles on Interview: Kyrie Ru of Overture Interactive
- Tobi Alafin on The Doubt of the Benefit: Fake Progress and Lumosity’s “Brain Games”
-
Medium Difficulty Tweets
-
Featured Posts
-
Putting the “Role” in Role Playing Games
4 May 2012 -
Gamer Profiles: The Split-screener
17 April 2013 -
What’s Wrong With Game Reviews?
26 April 2012 -
Firing the Canon: Planescape: Torment
7 March 2012 -
EQUIP WOLF SHIRT>USE:WHISKEY// ON: THE NEXT GENERATION AND THE DESIRE
22 March 2013
-
-
Meta
- Entries RSS
- WordPress.org
Tag Archives: dan pinchbeck
An Ode to Stanley & Esther
Popular gaming culture today swells with generic shooters, unoriginal shtick, franchise building, and overproduced games from big developers that rarely deviate from anything already on the market. The release of more and more games with each passing year renders many … Continue reading →
Posted in
Critical Conversation
,
Reviews
|
Tagged
Chris Marker
,
dan pinchbeck
,
Davey Wreden
,
Dear Esther
,
diegesis
,
Film Socialisme
,
Free Tea With Purchase of a Family Meal
,
Jean-Luc Godard
,
La Jetee
,
Metal Gear
,
Miguel Penabella
,
Portal
,
Robert Briscoe
,
San Soleil
,
schrodinger's cat
,
spec ops: the line
,
the futility of choice
,
The Stanley Parable
,
thechineseroom
|
Leave a comment
The Mind’s Eye: In Defence of Subjectivity
I learned the joy of owning a ZX Spectrum this week, but I’ve never played one. I felt the connection between Dear Esther and the end of a relationship I never had. I understood the fear of being an inadequate mother, although I am not a parent. It’s easy to see how a piece entitled “What’s wrong with game reviews?” would provoke games writers, especially those who subscribe to New Games Journalism, but Joseph Hilgard’s essay contradicts what I believe about the value of subjectivity in games writing.
Hilgard and I are both psychologists, and we both focus on video games. My undergraduate dissertation studied non-verbal behaviour differences in violent and non-violent games. Even with a science background, it is a mistake to treat game reviewing as an exact science, something that can be dissected and analysed, assigned scores and scales. There is no ‘Five Factor Model’ of gaming. That approach reminds me of when game review magazines had entire columns dedicated to scores: giving games separate marks for their gameplay and graphic fidelity which didn’t count towards an overall score. Continue reading →
Posted in
Critical Conversation
,
Criticism
|
Tagged
Alan Williamson
,
dan pinchbeck
,
deadly premonition
,
Dear Esther
,
gamefeel
,
hiking tour
,
Joseph Hilgard
,
kieron gillen
,
kyle stegerwald
,
mass effect 3
,
Metacritic
,
metacriticism
,
New Games Journalism
,
non-violent games
,
psychology
,
review scores
,
sega
,
Skyrim
,
subjectivity
,
super metroid
,
tetris
,
violent games
,
zx spectrum
|
5 Comments